A Comparative Study of the Perspectives of Islamic and Indonesian Criminal Codes Towards Robber

Miftahudin Setia Nugraha, M. Roji Iskandar, Amrullah Hayatudin

Abstract


The rise of robbery crime makes people uneasy because of the disruption of security and harmony. The majority of Indonesia's population is Muslim. However, the Indonesian criminal code is derived from the heritage of the colonial Dutch’s Code of Penal. The law has a different philosophical foundation with the philosophy espoused by the Indonesian people, giving rise to another problem. The main problem in this study includes some questions. (1) How is the provision of penalties for robbery under Islamic criminal code? (2) How is the provision of penalties for robbery under Indonesian criminal code? (3) What are similarities and differences in provision of penalties for robbery under the criminal codes of Islam and Indonesia? This study has several objectives. Firstly, this study is to determine the provisions of the robber sentenced under the Islamic criminal code. Secondly, it is to determine the provisions of robber punishment under the Indonesian criminal code. Thirdly, it is to know the differences and similarities of robber punishment under the Islamic and Indonesian criminal codes. This study used descriptive and comparative approaches with the normative juridical approach and library research. The results of the study suggest that the punishment for the crime of robbery under the Islamic criminal code covers being killed (or crucified), crossed cut off on hands and feet, and exiled (from homeland). The given punishment must be tailored to specific criteria. According to the Indonesian criminal code, punishment for robbery includes several conditions. First, a robber who only takes goods is punishable by imprisonment for a maximum of nine years. Second, a robber who took goods at night, and in a quiet place or street, and resulted in serious victim injuries is punishable by imprisonment for a maximum of twelve years. Third, a robber who takes goods and makes the victims death is punishable by imprisonment for a maximum of fifteen years. Fourth, a two or more allied robbers who takes victim's property and causes victim death or grievous bodily harm.

Keywords


Robber, Islamic Criminal code, Indonesian Criminal code

References


Buku

A. Djazuli. 1997. Fiqh Jinayah: Upaya Menanggulangi Kejahatan dalam Islam. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Adami Chazawi. 2013. Kejahatan Terhadap Harta Benda. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

Adi Hamzah. 2014. KUHP dan KUHAP. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Asadulloh Al-Faruk. 2009. Hukum Pidana Dalam Sistem Hukum Islam. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Dede Rosyada, 1992. Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial. Jakarta: Lembaga Studi Islam dan Kemasyarakatan.

M. Nurul Irfan dan Masyrofah. 2013. Fiqih Jinayah. Jakarta: Amzah.

Makrus Munajat. 2004. Dekonstruksi Hukum Pidana Islam. Yogyakarta: Logung Pustaka.

Mustafa Hasan dan Beni Ahmad Saebani. 2013. Hukum Pidana Islam; Fiqh Jinayah., Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Zaenudin Ali. 2013. Hukum Islam; Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

----------------. 2009. Hukum Pidana Islam. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Ensiklopedi dan Kamus

Tim Tsalisah. 2008. Eksiklopedi Hukum Pidana Islam. Bogor: Karisma Ilmu.

Depdikbud R.I. 1990. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka

Internet

Bayu Adi Wicaksono dan Rizki Aulia Racman, Apa Itu Begal: Begal Bukan Bahasa Hukum, http://metro.news.viva.co.id. Diakses pada tanggal 17 Juni 2015, pukul 20.45 WIB.

M. Dwi Cahyono, Kilas Sejarah Begal Jawa Kuno, http://www.malang-post.com. Diakses pada tanggal 17 Juni 2015

Pebriansyah Ariefana, Asal Usul Istilah Begal, http://www.suara.com. Diakses pada tanggal 14 Juni 2015, pukul 16.03 WIB.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/islamic%20family.v0i0.2532

Flag Counter                      Â