Studi Komparasi Kepuasan Pertemanan Dan Sujective Well Being Saat Covid-19 Remaja Panti Asuhan Di Bandung

Aldian Firdaus, Ihsana Sabriani Borualogo

Abstract


Abstract. The study was to compare friendship and subjective well being (SWB) to the youth orphanage in Bandung before and during the Covid-19 pandemic. In 2020’s early pandemic study, there has been a significant impact between friendship satisfaction and SWB. Today in Indonesia during the Covid-19 pandemic that affectd everyone, including foster children, all the children who lived in the orphnage had little chance of interaction with other friends. The study was longitudinal research so the population and samples that ware used ware similar sampels to previous year’s research. The participants (N= 97% girl’s 60,8% and boy’s 39.2%). Data retrieval is being conducted using a cluster random sampling technique. The study used measuring (CW-SWBS) and friendship satisfaction. Database fuling is using questionnaires. The data was analysed using compare means analysis. The results of the study have shown no significant difference in the charitabl and social discontent of before and at this time of the Covid-19 pandemic, meaning that the continuous Covid-19 doesn’t affect the teenager children of orphanages in Bandung.

Keywords: Friend satisfaction, Ophanage, Teenager, Subjective well being

Abstract. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan kepuasan pertemanan dan subjective well being (SWB) pada anak remaja panti asuhan di Bandung pada sebelum dan saat masa pandemi covid-19. Pada penelitian tahun 2020 sebelum masa pandemi menunjukan terdapat pengaruh signifikan antara kepuasan pertemanan terhadap swb. Sekarang di Indonesia terjadi masa pandemi covid-19 yang berdampak terhadap semua orang termasuk anak remaja panti asuhan, seluruh anak remaja yang tinggal didalam panti asuhan menjadi kurang memiliki kesempatan berinteraksi dengan teman-teman yang lainnya. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian longitudinal sehingga populasi dan sampel yang digunakan merupakan sampel yang sama dengan penelitian tahun sebelumnya. Partisipan penelitian ini (N = 97; perempuan 60.8% dan laki-laki 39.2%). Pengambilan data dilakukan mengunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Penelitian ini menggunakan alat ukur subjective well being(CW-SWBS) dan kepuasan pertemanan. Pengambilan data menggunakan kuisioner. Data dianalisis menggunakan analisis compare means. Hasil penelitian menunjukan tidak ada perbedaan siginifikan kepuasan pertemanan dan SWB pada sebelum dan saat masa pandemi covid-19 artinya bahwa masa pandemic covid-19 yang sedang terjadi sekarang tidak berpengaruh terhadap anak remaja panti asuhan di kota Bandung.

Kata Kunci: Kepuasan Pertemanan , Panti Asuhan , Remaja , Subjective well being


Keywords


keywords

Full Text:

PDF

References


Borualogo, I. S. (2004). Hubungan antara persepsi tentang figur attchment dengan self esteem remaja panti asuhan Muhammadiyah. Jurnal Psikologi, 13(1), 29-49.

Borualogo, I. S., & Casas, F. (2019). Adaptation and validation of the Children’s Worlds Subjective Well-Being Scale (CW-SWBS) in Indonesia. Jurnal Psikologi. 46(2). 102-116. https://doi.org/102.22146/jpsi.38995

Borualogo, I. S., Gumilang, E., Mubarak, A., Khasanah, A. N., Wardati, M. A., Diantina, F. P., Permataputri, I., & Casas, F. (2018). Process of translation of the children’s worlds subjective well-being scale in Indonesia. Social and Humaniora Research Symposium, 307, 108 – 183. https://doi.org/10.2991/sores-18.2019.42

Bradshaw, J., Keung, A., Rees, G., & Goswami, H. (2011). Children’s subjective well-being: International comparative perspectives. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(4), 548–556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.05.010

Bukowski, W. M., Buhrmester, D., & Underwood, M. K. (2011). Peer relations as a developmental context. In M. K. Underwood & L. H. Rosen (Eds.), Social development: Relationships in infancy, childhood, and adolescence. (pp.153–179). The Guilford. https://www.guilford.com/excerpts/underwood2.pdf?t

Campbell, A., Converse, P., & Rodgers,W. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. Russel Sage Foundation. https://www.russellsage.org/sites/default/files/QualityAmLife.pdf

Carvalho, J. M. S., Delgado, P., Montserrat, C., Llosada-Gistau, J., & Casas, F. (2020). Subjective Well-Being of Children in Care: Comparison Between Portugal and Catalonia. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-020-00675-3

Casas, F. (2016). Children, adolescents and quality of life: The social sciences perspective over two decades. In F. Maggino (Ed.). A life devoted to quality of life. Festschrift in honor of alex c. Michalos. (pp. 3–21). Springer Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20568-7_1

Casas, F., Bălţătescu, S., Bertran, I., González, M., & Hatos, A. (2013). School satisfaction among adolescents: testing different indicators for its measurement and its relationship with overall life satisfaction and subjective well-being in romania and spain. Social Indicators Research, 111(3), 665– 681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0025-9

Casas, F., Bello, A., Gonzalez, M., & Aligué, M. (2012). Personal well-being among Spanish adolescents. Journal of Social Research and Policy, 3(2), 19-45. https://www.unicef.es/sites/unicef.es/files/ARTICULO_Journal_of_Social _Research__Policy_Vol3_Iss2.pdf

Cheung, S. K., &. McBride-Chang, C. (2014). Friendship satisfaction. A. C. Micholas (ed), encyclopedia of quality of life and well being research. (pp. 2364 – 2366). Springer Science+Bussiness Media Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5

Chui, W. H., & Wong, M. Y. H. (2015). Gender differences in happiness and life satisfaction among adolescents in hong kong: relationships and selfconcept. Social Indicators Research, 125(3), 1035–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0867-z

Collins, W. A., & Russell, G. (1991). Mother-child and father-child relationships in middle childhood and adolescence: A developmental analysis. Developmental Review, 11(2), 99-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273- 2297(91)90004-8

Crespo, C., Kielpikowski, M., Jose, P. E., & Pryor, J. (2009). Relationships between family connectedness and body satisfaction: a longitudinal study of adolescent girls and boys. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(12), 1392– 1401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9433-9

Cummins, R. A. (2014). Understanding the well-being of children and adolescents through homeostatic theory. Handbook of Child Well-Being, 635–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_152

Demir M., Orthel H., & Andelin A. K. (2014). Friendship and happiness. Northern Arizona University,USA. https://www.adrianandelin.com/FriendshipHappiness.pdf

Departemen Sosial Republik Indonesia (2004). Acuan umum pelayanan sosial anak di panti sosial asuhan anak. Jakarta: Departemen Sosial RI.

Desmita. 2014. Psikologi perkembangan peserta didik. Bandung: Rosdakarya

Deutz, M. H. F., Lansu, T. A. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2014). Children’s observed interactions with best friends: Associations with friendship jealousy and satisfaction. Social Development, 24(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12080

Diener, E, & Scollon, C. (2003). Subjective well-being is desirable, but not the summum bonum. Paper presented at the Workshop on Well-Being, Minneapolis, MN, USA. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228604713_Subjective_wellbeing_is_desirable_but_not_the_summum_bonum

Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34– 43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34

Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(2), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-006-9007-x

Diener, E. (2009). Subjective well-being. The Science of Well-Being: The Collected Works of Ed Diener, 11–58. https://sci-hub.tw/10.1007/978-90-481-2350- 6_2

Diener, E., & Lucas, R. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213-229). Russell Sage Foundation. https://www.eddiener.com/articles/1367

Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13(1), 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00415

Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., Oishi, S., & Suh, E. M. (2002). Looking up and looking down: weighting good and bad information in life satisfaction judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(4), 437–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202287002

Diener, E., Napa-Scollon, C. K., Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V., & Suh, E. M. (2000). Positivity and the construction of life satisfaction judgments: Global happiness is not the sum of its parts. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Periodical on Subjective Well-Being, 1(2), 159-176. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010031813405

Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056

Dinisman, T., & Ben-Arieh, A. (2015). The characteristics of children’s subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 126(2), 555–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0921-x

Dinisman, T., Montserrat, C., & Cassas, F. (2012). The subjective well-being of Spanish adolescent: Variants according to different living arrangements. Children and Youth Services Review. 34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.09.005

Eddington, N., & Shuman, R. (2005). Subjective well-being (happiness). Continuing Psychology Education: 6 Continuing Education Hours. 1-3. https://www.texcpe.com/html/pdf/ny/ONYSWB.pdf

Goswami, H. (2011). Social relationships and children’s subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 107(3), 575–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9864-z

Hoorn, A.V. (2008). A short introduction to subjective well-being: measurement, correlates and policy uses. University of Rome Tor Vergata. https://www.oecd.org/site/worldforum06/38331839.pdf

Hartup, W. W., & Stevens, N. (1999). Friendships and adaptation across the life span. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(3), 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00018

Holder, M. D., & Coleman, B. (2009). The contribution of social relationships to children’s happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(3), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-007-9083-0

Huebner, E. S., Seligson, J. L., Valois, R. F., & Suldo, S. M. (2006). A review of the brief multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale. Social Indicators Research, 79(3), 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-5395-9

Huebner, E. S., Suldo, S. M., Smith, L. C., & McKnight, C. G. (2004). Life satisfaction in children and youth: Empirical foundations and implications for school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 41(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10140

Ilhamsyah, D. Y., & Borualogo, I. S. (2021). Pengaruh Kepuasan Pertemanan terhadap Subjective Well-Being Remaja Panti Asuhan. August 2020

Jones, D, C. (1991). Friendship satisfaction and gender: An examination of sex differences in contributors to friendship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 8 (1), 167-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540759108200

Klocke, A., Clair, A., & Bradshaw, J. (2014). International variation in child subjective well-being. Child Indicators Research, 7(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-013-9213-7

Ladd, G. W., Kochenderfer, B. J., & Coleman, C. C. (1996). Friendship quality as a predictor of young children’s early school adjustment. Child Development, 67(3), 1103. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131882

Lawler, M. J., Newland, L. A., Giger, J. T., Roh, S., & Brockevelt, B. L. (2016). Ecological, relationship-based model of children’s subjective well-being: perspectives of 10-year-old children in the united states and 10 other countries. Child Indicators Research, 10(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-016-9376-0

Llosada-Gistau, J., Casas, F., & Montserrat, C. (2016). What matters in for the subjective well-being of children in care?. Child Indicators Research, 10(3), 735–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-016-9405-z

Lyubomirsky, S., & Dickerhoof, R., (2005). Subjective well-being. In J. Worell & C. D Goodheart (eds.), Handbook of Girls’ and Women’s Psychological Health. Gender and Well-Being Across the Life-Span. (pp. 166 – 174). Oxford University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=YBdnDAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontco ver&dq=Handbook+of+girls%E2%80%99+and+women%E2%80%99s+p sychological+health:+Gender+and+wellbeing+across+the+life+span,&hl= id&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwippr6E5rfqAhWXXCsKHb2UCwgQ6AEwAHo ECAAQAg#v=onepage&q=Lyubomirsky&f=false

Lyubomirsky, S., Tkach, C., & DiMatteao, M. R. (2006). What are the differences between happiness and self-esteem. Social Indicators Research, 78, 363– 404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-0213-y.

Kaye-Tzadok, A., Kim, S. S., & Main, G. (2017). Children’s subjective well-being in relation to gender — What can we learn from dissatisfied children?. Children and Youth Services Review, 80, 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.058

Mendelson, M. J., & Aboud, F. E (1999). Measuring friendship quality in late adolescent and young adults: Mcgill friendship questionners. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 31(2), 130 – 132. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087080

Llosada-Gistau, J., Casas, F., & Montserrat, C. (2016). What matters in for the subjective well-being of children in care?. Child Indicators Research, 10(3), 735–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-016-9405-z

Navarro, D., Montserrat, C., Malo, S., González, M., Casas, F., & Crous, G. (2015). Subjective well-being: what do adolescents say?. Child & Family Social Work, 22(1), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12215

Newland, L., Giger, J., Lawler, M., Roh, S., Brockevelt., B & Schweinle, A. (2018). Multilevel analysis of child and adolescent subjective well-being across 14 countries: Child-and country-level predictors. Child Development. https://doi.org/90.10.1111/cdev.13134.

Oriol, X., Torres, J., Miranda, R., Bilbao, M., & Ortúzar, H. (2017). Comparing family, friends and satisfaction with school experience as predictors of SWB in children who have and have not made the transition to middle school in different countries. Children and Youth Services Review, 80, 149–156. https://doi.org/:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.053

Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29(4), 611–621. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.4.611

Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164– 172. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164

Pedersen, S., Vitaro, F., Barker, E. D., & Borge, A. I. H. (2007). The timing of middle-childhood peer rejection and friendship: linking early behavior to early-adolescent adjustment. Child Development, 78(4), 1037–1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01051.x

Proctor, C., Linley, P.A., & Maltby, J. (2010). Very happy youths: benefits of very high life satisfaction among adolescents. Social Indicators Research, 98, 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9562-2

Requena, F. (1995). Friendship and subjective well-being in Spain: A cross-national comparison with the United States. Social Indicators Research, 35(3), 271– 288. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01079161

Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 98–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98

Savahl, S., Montserrat, C., Casas, F., Adams, S., Tiliouine, H., Benninger, E., & Jackson, K. (2018). Children’s Experiences of Bullying Victimization and the Influence on Their Subjective Well-Being: A Multinational Comparison. Child Development. 1-18 https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13135

Schütz, F. F., Cassarino-Perez, L., & Córdova, V. E. (2017). Subjective Well-Being of Children in Residential Care. In J.C. Sarriera, L.M. Bedin (eds.), Psychosocial Well-being of Children and Adolescents in Latin America. (pp. 47 – 70). Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research 16. https://doi.org/1010.1007/978-3-319-55601-7_3

Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and big five personality traits: a social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00625.x

Santiarsa, C.D., & Noor, H. (2018). Hubungan loneliness dengan life satisfaction pada remaja panti asuhan Al-Ikhlas Bandung. Prosiding Psikologi Unisba. 4(2),592 – 598. http://karyailmiah.unisba.ac.id/index.php/psikologi/article/view/11365

Vitaro, F., Boivin, M., & Bukowski, W. M. (2009). The role of friendship in child and adolecent psychosocial development. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of Peer Interactions, relationships and Groups (pp. 568 - 588). Guilford Press well-being of older African Americans. Journal of Happiness Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902- 015-9626-8

Wilson, R. E., Harris, K., & Vazire, S. (2015). Personality and friendship satisfaction in daily life: do everyday social interactions account for individual differences in friendship satisfaction?. European Journal of Personality, 29(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1996

World Health Organization. (2020). https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus#tab=tab_1




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/.v0i0.28330

Flag Counter    Â