Pengaruh Persepsi Rasa Aman Terhadap Subjective Well-Being Pada Korban Perundungan Saudara Kandung

Rivanty Shafausta Rahma, Ihsana Sabriani Borualogo

Abstract


Abstract. This study aimed to explain the contribution of perception of safety towards subjective well-being (SWB) of sibling bullying victims during COVID-19. The data was obtained by using the convenience sampling and collected online by using Google Form. The participants of the current study were 10-18 years old children and adolescence who was bullied by their siblings (N=506) and categorized based on the frequency of bullying experiences twice in a month. Safety perception was measured by using a measuring instrument from Children’s Worlds. The Children’s Worlds Subjective Well-Being Scale (CW-SWBS) was used to measured SWB. Children’s Worlds Sibling Bullying Scale was used to categorized sibling bullying victims. Linear regression analysis examined the contribution of safety perception towards SWB. Descriptive analysis showed frequency and score means based on gender and age group. The result showed the perception of safety contributed 21.1% significantly positively to SWB on sibling bullying victims during pandemic COVID-19. Victims of sibling bullying reported lower SWB compared to Cummins’s homeostasis theory and compared to sibling bullying research conducted by Borualogo and Casas before COVID-19. This indicates that parents must give serious attention to stop sibling bullying at home during COVID-19.

Keywords: COVID-19, Sibling Bullying, Safety Feeling, Subjective Well-Being.

Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memaparkan kontribusi persepsi rasa aman terhadap subjective well-being (SWB) korban perundungan saudara kandung dimasa COVID-19. Data dapatkan secara online menggunakan Google Form dengan teknik sampling convenience. Partisipan adalah anak dan remaja usia 10-18 tahun korban perundungan saudara kandung (N=506) yang dikategorisasi berdasarkan frekuensi perundungan yang dialami yaitu lebih dari dua kali dalam sebulan. Persepsi rasa aman diukur dengan alat ukur dari Children’s Worlds. SWB diukur dengan Children’s Worlds Subjective Well-Being (CW-SWBS). Alat ukur perundungan saudara kandung Children’s Worlds digunakan untuk kategorisasi korban perundungan saudara kandung. Analisis regresi linier digunakan untuk menguji kontribusi persepsi rasa aman terhadap SWB. Analisis deskriptif menyajikan frekuensi dan skor mean berdasarkan jenis kelamin dan kelompok usia. Persepsi rasa aman (β= .445; p< .01) memiliki kontribusi signifikan positif sebesar 21.1% terhadap SWB pada korban perundungan saudara kandung dimasa COVID-19. Korban perundungan saudara kandung melaporkan SWB yang lebih rendah (M=59.93; SD= 27.34) dibandingkan rerata normal SWB berdasarkan teori homeostasis Cummins dan hasil penelitian Borualogo dan Casas terkait perundungan saudara kandung sebelum masa COVID-19. Hasil ini perlu menjadi perhatian serius bagi orangtua untuk menghentikan perundungan saudara kandung di rumah di masa COVID-19.

Kata Kunci: COVID-19, Perundungan Saudara Kandung, Rasa Aman, Subjective Well-Being.

Keywords


COVID-19, Perundungan Saudara Kandung, Rasa Aman, Subjective Well-Being.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ben-Arieh, A., & Shimoni, E. (2014). Subjective well-being and perceptions of safety among Jewish and Arab children in Israel. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.05.017

Bordens, K. S., & Abbott, B. B. (2011). Research design and methods: A process approach 8th Edition. New York: McGraw Hill.

Borualogo, I. S., & Casas, F. (2019). Adaptation and Validation of The Children's Worlds Subjective Well-Being Scale (CW-SWBS) in Indonesia. Jurnal Psikologi, 46(2), 102-116. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.38995

Borualogo, I. S., & Casas, F. (2021a). Children’s and adolescents’s report on their quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic [Manuscript in review]. Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Islam Bandung & ERIDIqv University of Girona, Spain.

Borualogo, I. S., & Casas, F. (2021b). Children’s subjective well-being during COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia: Two periods of data collections [Manuscript in review]. Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Islam Bandung & ERIDIqv University of Girona, Spain.

Borualogo, I. S., & Casas, F. (2021c). Subjective well-being of bullied children in Indonesia. Applied Research in Quality of Life. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-019-09778-1

Borualogo, I. S., & Casas, F. (2021d). The relationship between frequent bullying and subjective well-being in Indonesian children. Population Review, 60(1), 26-50. https://doi.org/10.1353/prv.2021.0002

Borualogo, I. S., & Gumilang, E. (2019). Kasus perundungan anak di Jawa Barat : temuan awal Children’s Worlds Survey di Indonesia. Psympathic: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 6(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v6i1.4439

Borualogo, I. S., Gumilang, E., Mubarak, A., Khasanah, A. N., Wardati, M. A., Diantina, F. P., Permataputri, I., & Casas, F. (2019). Process of translation of the Children's Worlds subjective well-being scale in Indonesia. 1st Social and Humaniora Research Symposium (SoRes 2018) : Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 307. https://doi.org/10.2991/sores-18.2019.42

Caffaro, J. (2020). Sibling abuse of other children. In Geffiner R. et al. (eds.), Handbook of interpersonel violence across the lifespan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62122-7_11-1

Casas, F. (2016). Children, adolescents and quality of life: the social sciences perspective over two decades. In F. Maggino (ed.), A Life Devoted to Quality of Life, Social Indicators Research Series, 60, 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20568-7_1

Casas, F., Bello, A., González, M., & Aligue, M. (2013). Children’s subjective well-being measured using a composite incex: what impacts Spanish first-year secondary education students’ subjective well-being? Child Indicators Research, 6, 433-460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-013-9182-x

Casas F., & González-Carrasco, M. (2018). Subjective well-being decreasing with age: new research on children over 8. Child Development, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13133

Cummins, R. A. (2014). Understanding the well-being of children and adolescents through homeostatic theory. In Ben-Arieh A., Casas F., Frones I., & Korbin J. E. (Eds.), Handbook of child well-being: Theories, methods and policies in global perspective (pp. 635–662). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8

Cummins, R. A. (2016). The theory of subjective wellbeing homeostasis: a contribution to understanding life quality. Social Indicators Research Series, 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20568-7_4

Cummins, R.A. (2018). The golden triangle of happiness: essential resources for a happy family. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 9(4), 12-39. https://doi.org/ 10.18357/ijcyfs94201818638

Dewi, R. K. (2020, April 14). Mengenal apa itu PSBB, aturan daerah yang menerapkan hingga sanksinya. KOMPAS.COM. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2020/04/14/093800065/mengenal-apa-itu-psbb-aturan-daerah-yang-menerapkan-hingga-sanksinya

Fattore, T., Mason, J., Watson, E. (2008). When children are asked about their well-being: towards a framework for guiding policy. Child Indicators Research, 2(1), 57-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-

-9025-3

Huebner, E. S. (2004). Research on assessment of life satisfaction of children and adolescents. Social Indicators Research, 66, 3-33. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:soci.0000007497.57754.e3

Huripah, E. (2015). Pemenuhan hak rasa aman bagi anak sebagai implementasi hak anak. Peksos: Jurnal Ilmiah Pekerjaan Sosial, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.31595/peksos.v13i1.33

Liu, X., Peng, C., Yu, Y., Yang, M., Qing, Z., Qiu, X., & Yang, X. (2020). Association between sub-types of sibling bullying and mental health distress among Chinese children and adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(368). http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00368

Olweus, D. (1997). Bully/victim problems in school: facts and intervention. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12(4), 495-510. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172807

Petito, F., & Cummins, R. A. (2000). Quality of Life in adolescence: the role of perceived control, parenting style, and social support. Behavior Change, 17(3), 196-207. https://doi.org/10.1375/bech.17.3.196

Pikobar Jabar. (2021, May 31). Dashboard statistik kasus COVID-19 provinsi Jawa Barat. Pikobar Jabar. https://pikobar.jabarprov.go.id/data

Prime, H., Wade, M., & Browne, D. T. (2020). Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Psychological Association, 75(5), 631-643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000660

Rees, G., Savahl, S., Lee, B. J., & Casas, F. (2020). Children’s views on their lives and well-being in 35 countries: A report on the Children’s Worlds project, 2016-19. Jerusalem, Israel: Children’s Worlds Project (ISCWeB). https://isciweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Childrens-Worlds-Comparative-Report2020.pdf

Savahl, S., Adams, S., Montserrat, C., Casas, F., Tiliouine, H., Benninger, E., & Jackson, K. (2018). Children’s Experiences of Bullying Victimization and the Influence on Their Subjective Well-Being: A Multinational Comparison. Child Development, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13135

UNICEF. (2021, n.d.). Konvensi Hak Anak: Versi anak-anak. UNICEF Indonesia. https://www.unicef.org/indonesia/id/konvensi-hak-anak-versi-anak-anak#:~:text=Konvensi%20Hak%20Anak%3A%20Versi%20anak.%20Anak%20adalah%20semua,Hak-hak%20anak%20berlaku%20atas%20semua%20anak%20tanpa%20terkecuali

Varela, J.J., Alfaro, J., Melipillan, R., Gomez, D.O., & González-Carrasco, M. (2019). Perception of safety, satisfaction with neighborhood and life satisfaction among Chilean adolescents. Child Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-019-09649-z

Wahana Visi Indonesia. (2020, July 2). Penilaian cepat dampak COVID-19 dan pengaruhnya terhadap anak Indonesia. Wahana Visi Indonesia. https://wahanavisi.org/userfiles/post/2007095F06D0B6565D6_LGID.pdf

Wolke, D., Tippett, N., & Dantchev, S. (2015). Bullying in the family: sibling bullying. The Lancet Psychiatry, 2(10), 917-929. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00262-X




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/.v0i0.28311

Flag Counter    Â