Students personality profiles who do academic corruptions in psychology faculty of UNISBA “X†class observed from Big Five Theory.

Desti Yuniarti, Temi Damayanti Djamhoer

Abstract


Academic corruption is a problem that everyone talks about in universities especially UNISBA. So does psychology faculty of UNISBA, it has the same problem such as plagiarism, cooperation in the examination, opening textbook or gadget in the examintaion time, forging data, signing other’s signature, copying other’s answer in the examination and so on. The punishment seem does not make the doers give up. The reasons behind those corruptions is fear and anxiety that they can not join the examination. They are worried to restudy the subjects, lazy to do tasks, helpful for friends, frightened to be avoided by others, and very bad competitor. Those bahaviours are explained by McCarae and Costa in their big five personality theory including: neuroticism (N), extraversion (E), openness to new experience (O), agreeableness (A), conscientiousness (C). Those typical personalities have either high and low. The objective of this study is to describe students’ personality who did academic corruption especially in psychology faculty class X. The sample of the population is 35 students of UNISBA. From the data calculation using big five measuring instrument arranged by Goldberg in International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) website. The results show that personality type of the students is high neurotic type, low extraversion, low openness, low agreeable, and low consientiousness (N↑E↓O↓A↓C↓). It means that they have high anxiety, inconfident, lazy, immoral, goalless to do something.

Keywords


Academic corruption, personality, Big Five Personality.

References


Albrecht, W., et al. 2011. Fraud Examination (on-line).

http://books.google.co.id/books?id=SBzJYBsFPIC&dq=fraud+examination&hl=id&source=gbs_navlinks_s, diakses 4 Juni 2014

Alwisol. 2008. Psikologi Kepribadian (Edisi Revisi).Malang: UMMPress. 2012

Arikunto, S. 2003. Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Becker., et al. 2006. Using the business fraud triangle to predict academic dishonesty among business students. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal. Vol.10, diakses pada 4 Maret 2015

Feist, Jess., Feist, Grefory.J. Theories of Personality, edisi ke-7, jilid 2. Terj: Smita P.S. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika, 2010

Goldberg, L. R. 2006. The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality. 40, 84–96.

Hendricks, B. 2004. Academic Dishonesty: A Study in The Magnitude of and Justification for Academic Dishonesty Among Collage Undergraduate and Graduate Student. Journal of Collage Student Development. 35 (March), 212-260.

Lambert, E.G., Hogan, N.L., & Barton, S.M. (2003). Collegiate academic dishonesty revisited: what have they done, how often have they done it, who does it, and why did they do it. Electronic Journal of Sosiology (Online), (http://www.sociology.org/content/vol7.4/lambert_etal.htm)l, diakses 4 juni 2014

Lozier, K.A. 2010. Student Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty Scenarios. An Honors Thesis (PSYSC 499), diakses pada 24 September 2014

McCabe, Donald.L., Treviño, K.L., Butterfield, Kenneth.D., 2001. Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research. ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 11(3), 219–232.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr., 1987. Validation of the Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Instruments and Observers. 52, 81-90.

Miller, et al. 2011. Reasons Not to Cheat, Academic-Integrity Responsibility, and Frequency of Cheating. The Journal of Experimental Education.

Noor, Hasanudin. 2009. Psikometri. Aplikasi Dalam Penyusunan Instrumen Pengukuran Perilaku. Bandung: Jauhar Mandiri.

Pervin, Lawrence.A., Cervone, Daniel., John, Oliver.P. Personality: theory and research, 9th edition. Terj: Anwar A.K. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2004

Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/.v0i0.2381

Flag Counter    Â