Hubungan antara Teacher Support dengan Student Engagement pada Siswa SMP “X†Bandung
Abstract
Abstract. West Java is in the top rank of the highest students dropping out of school. In the 2015/2016 and 2017/2018 academic years, 19,479 students dropped out at the junior high school level. One of the causes of dropping out, especially for students with low socioeconomic status as vulnerable parties, is the lack of student participation in learning activities which is a form of low student engagement. One of the factors that influence student engagement is the relationship between teachers and students which can be manifested in the form of teacher support. This research was conducted because there are still some differences between previous research and phenomena in the field, especially for students with low socioeconomic status. The purpose of this research was to determine how closely the relationship between teacher support and student engagement. This research used a correlational method with a population study of 93 students of SMP "X" Bandung. Measurements were made using a modification of the perceived teacher academic support scale (PTASS) and a modified student engagement scale (SES) which is distributed via google form. The results showed that there was a strong and significant relationship between teacher support and student engagement on students of SMP "X" Bandung (r = .686, p <0.01). All teacher support dimensions correlated with student engagement, with instrumental support (r = .641, p <0.01) as the dimension with the strongest correlation.
Keywords: Student Engagement, Teacher Support, Educational Psychology, Socioeconomic Status.
Abstrak. Jawa Barat menempati peringkat teratas terkait jumlah siswa putus sekolah terbanyak. Pada tahun ajaran pendidikan 2015/2016 dan 2017/2018 terdapat 19.479 siswa yang mengalami putus sekolah pada jenjang SMP/sederajat. Salah satu penyebab putus sekolah terutama pada siswa dengan status sosial ekonomi (SSE) rendah sebagai pihak yang rentan terdampak adalah kurangnya partisipasi siswa dalam kegiatan pembelajaran yang merupakan bentuk dari rendahnya student engagement atau keterlibatan siswa. Salah satu faktor yang memengaruhi student engagement adalah hubungan antara guru dengan siswa yang dapat diwujudkan dalam bentuk teacher support atau dukungan guru. Penelitian ini dilakukan karena masih terdapat beberapa perbedaan antara penelitian terdahulu dengan fenomena di lapangan terutama pada siswa dengan status sosial ekonomi (SSE) rendah. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui seberapa erat hubungan antara teacher support dengan student engagement. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah korelasional dengan studi populasi sebanyak 93 orang siswa SMP “X†Bandung. Pengukuran dilakukan menggunakan modifikasi alat ukur perceived academic teacher support scale (PTASS) dan modifikasi alat ukur student engagement scale (SES) yang disebarkan melalui google form. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang kuat dan signifikan antara teacher support dengan student engagement pada siswa SMP “X†Bandung (r = .686, p < 0.01). Seluruh dimensi teacher support berkorelasi dengan student engagement, dengan instrumental support (r = .641, p < 0.01) sebagai dimensi yang memiliki korelasi terkuat.
Kata Kunci: Keterlibatan Siswa, Dukungan Guru, Psikologi Pendidikan, Status Sosial Ekonomi.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Chen, J. J. L. (2005). Relation of academic support from parents, teachers, and peers to Hong Kong adolescents’ academic achievement: The mediating role of academic engagement. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(2), 77–127. https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.131.2.77-127
Dunleavy, J., Milton, P., & Crawford, C. (2010). The Search for Competence in the 21st Century. Quest Journal 2010.
Eccles, J.S. (1999). The development of children ages 6 to 14. The Future of
Children: When School Is Out. 9(2). 30-44.
Federici, R. A., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2014). Students’ perceptions of emotional and instrumental teacher support: Relations with motivational and emotional responses. International Education Studies, 7(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n1p21
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement Potential of the Concept. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Indrawati, E. S. (2015). Status Sosial Ekonomi Dan Intensitas Komunikasi Keluarga Pada Ibu Rumah Tangga Di Panggung Kidul Semarang Utara. Jurnal Psikologi Undip, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.14710/jpu.14.1.52-57
Kaplan, A., Patrick, H. & Ryan, A. M. (2007). Early adolescents' perception of classroom social environment, motivational belief, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology Vol 99 No I, 83-89.
Kaplan, A., Patrick, H. & Ryan, A. M. (2007). Early adolescents' perception of classroom social environment, motivational belief, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology Vol 99 No I, 83-89.
Kemendiknas. (2012). Sekolah menengah pertama. http://www.kemendiknas.go.id/kemdikbud/peserta-didik-sekolah-menengahpertama
Kemenpppa. (2018). Profil Anak Indonesia 2018. Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak. https://www.kemenpppa.go.id/lib/uploads/list/74d38-buku-pai-2018.pdf
Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153–184. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037001153
Newmann, F., Wehlage, G.G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11–39). New York: Teachers College Press.
Patrick, H. & Drake, B.M. (2009). Middle School. Dalam Anderman, E.M.,
Misall, K.N., Hojnoski, R.L., Patrick, H., Drake, B.M., & Jarvis, P. (Eds.). School trainsition. http://www.education.com/reference/article/school-transitions/
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The Influence of Affective Teacher–Student Relationships on Students’ School Engagement and Achievement. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529. doi:10.3102/0034654311421793
Savitri, Nurina. (2019, Juli 23). Partisipasi Pendidikan Naik Tapi Jutaan Anak Indonesia Masih Putus Sekolah. ABC News. Diunduh dari https://www.abc.net.au/
Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.). Handbook of research on student engagement, p. 21–44. Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2
Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: A process model of perceived control and children's engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.22
Supena, A. (2004). Prediktor terjadinya putus sekolah dini di sekolah dasar: Studi pada anak-anak usia SD yang menjalani aktivitas mencari uang di Kota Bekasi. [Disertasi Fakultas Psikologu Universitas Indonesia]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/.v6i2.22422
