The Implementation of Circular of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of 2011 on the Treatment for Whistleblower and Justice Collaborators in Specific Crime Cases Viewed from the US Law

Titin Cahayati, Dey Ravena, Dian Andriasari

Abstract


Currently growing variety of criminal offenses, in particular organized crime with tough modus operandi revealed. Obstacles faced by the criminal justice system (SPP) in uncovering the crime, that obtaining the evidence in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code. Government through UUPSK as the ratification of the UN Convention (UNCAC and UNTOC) governing the protection of witnesses and victims, including the provisions regarding whistleblower and justice collaborator. Whistleblower is a reporting criminal acts while justice collaborator is a witness who cooperated. The study aims to determine how the practice and implementation of SEMA No.4 of 2011 to provide legal protection for whistleblowers and justice collaborator. Research using normative juridical approach, specification of descriptive analysis, with a literature study research stage, and qualitative analysis of normative data. Reality legal protection of the whistleblower and the justice collaborator who arranged UUPSK been implemented according to regulations. However, because law enforcement also includes components of the SPP, then law enforcement will be in accordance subjectivity of each law enforcement agency. The obstacle of implementation SEMA No.4 of 2011 provides protection for whistleblowers is justice collaborator is the connective power of the SEMA is not strong, and will be an appeal to the judge, so the judge's decision will be different. In addition, SPP has policies and consideration of each in providing protection to the whistleblower and the justice collaborator.

Keywords


SEMA implementation Number 4 of 2011, witness and victim protection, criminal law enforcement, the criminal justice system.

References


Abdul Haris Semendawai, Santoso, Ferry. Et.All. Memahami Whistleblower. LPSK. Jakarta : 2011.

Andi, Hamzah. Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Ghalia Indonesia. Jakarta : 1985.

Bachsan, Mustafa. Sistem Hukum Admininstrasi Negara Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti. Bandung : 2001.

Firman, Wijaya. Whistle Blower dan Justice Collaborator Dalam Perspektif Hukum. Penaku. Jakarta : 2012.

Lilik, Mulyadi. Perlindungan Hukum Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborator Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Organized Crime. Alumni. Bandung : 2015.

Muladi, Barda, Nawawi. Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Alumni. Bandung : 2010.

Romli, Atmasasmita. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer. Kharisma Putra Utama. Jakarta : 2010.

Soerjono, Soekanto. Efektifitas Hukum dan Peranan Saksi. Remadja Karya. Bandung : 1985.

Sumber Lain :

Abdul Haris Semendawai, Eksistensi Justice Collaborator Dalam Perkara Korupsi

Catatan Tentang Urgensi Yuridis Atas Penetapannya Pada Proses Peradilan Pidana, LPSK, Jakarta, 2013.

Abdul Haris Semendawai,Pernyataan Ketua LPSK pada Media Informasi Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban (Kesaksian), Edisi II, Tahun 2012.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan :

Undang-Undang No.8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).

Undang-Undang No.13 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban.

Undang-Undang No. 31 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban.

Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 2011 Tentang

Perlakuan Bagi Saksi Pelapor (Whistleblower) dan Saksi Pelaku yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborators) di Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Tertentu.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/.v0i0.2578

Flag Counter     Â