The Criminal Accountability of the destruction of car by Andi “Ichiro†Wenas in Jakarta Based on Law of Traffic and Road Transportation in Conjunction with the Penal Code

Abstract

Traffic violations are violations committed by someone using two-wheeled vehicles or more, which could cause harm to self or others, problems - problems encountered in road range in traffic. It is motivated by a traffic jam, traffic violations, traffic accidents, patience, environmental pollution as well as to law enforcement to the community and the authorized agencies to handle violations of the law. Issues to be discussed in this essay is about how the criminal responsibility of the offenses committed by the destruction of cars Andi "Ichiro '' Wenas and what factors are causing Andi" Ichiro '' Wenas not penalized. The approach to research in this thesis is normative, the research done by examining the materials primary law and secondary law. Which deductive by analyzing the legislation, as well as the principles, theories, and conceptions of the scholars who explain about matters relevant to the research conducted Writer namely on traffic offenses committed intentionally that resulted in damage as a result of someone's car. Specifications research is descriptive analysis, which describes and explains the provisions and issues regarding the liability of any person for violations of traffic, which causes damage to the car. In analyzing the data, the authors used a qualitative analysis technique that is based on the normative legislation by adjusting the facts and the data obtained in the field. In respect of the results of this study, indicate that liability undertaken by Andi "Ichiro" Wenas divided into two viz. First, accountability materially, that accountability is materially no victim because there is nothing to report. Second, accountability is Formal, That accountability formally has been done in one of the television media and the factors that cause Andi "Ichiro" Wenas not subject to criminal sanctions is the first factor the second incident factors complainant and the third their misdemeanor, meaning this action is mild so no severe sanctions.