Calculation of Value at Risk (VaR) based on Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (ARCH) model.

Wahyuni Fatma Mufti, Sutawanir Darwis, Nusar Hajarisman

Abstract


Time commercial enterprises appear and provide more effective tools and devices for the future of the enterprises to solve dilemma of profit and create new profit growth. Value at Risk (VaR) model is used to solve the problems of time commercial enterprises. VaR model is a model used to measure the trade risk such as market risk, credit risk and so forth. The risk of VaR model refers to certain level of trust, in the period of the biggest loss probability. Data modelling of time series is done by variant assumption of constant error (homoscedasticity). In fact, many time series data have error variant that is inconstant (heteroscedasticity), especially for time series data in finances. It causes the modelling with the assumption of homoscedasticity is not used. Engle (1982) develops a model whose lines and kinds of time series data are modelled simultaneously.  The model is know as Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (ARCH) model. ARCH model is applied in share close price of Bank Mandiri to determine Value at Risk (VaR).

Keywords


Value at Risk (VaR), Heteroscedasticity, ARCH, Share.

References


Agung D. Buchdadi. Perhitungann Value at Risk Portofolio Optimum Saham Perusahaan Berbasis Syariah Dengan Pendekatan EwMA. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia Vol. 5 No.2. 2008

Cryer, J.D., dan Chan, KS. 2008. Time Series Analysis: With Apllication in R: Second Edition. USA: Spinger Science dan Businiess Media, LLC.

Cuoco, He, & Issaenko. 2001. Foundation of Risk Measurement. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, 8, 485-495.

Engle, R.F. 1982. Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity, Estimation Of United Kingdom Inflation. Journal Econometrika. Vol.50, No.4, pp. 987-1007.

Jorion, Philippe. Value at Risk : The New Benchmark For Managing Financial Risk. Mc.Graw Hill. 2001

Khindanova, Rachev, & Schwarts. 1999. A Theory of Perceived Risk and Attractiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 92-98.

Sartono, R.Agus., Andika Setiawan, Arie. 2006. VaR Portofolio Optima: Perbandingan Antara Metode Markowitz dan Mean Absolute Deviation. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis Hal 37-50.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/.v0i0.2624

Flag Counter     Â