Calculation of Composit Reliability and Maximal Reliability on confirmatory factor analysis.

Permata Kusumawardani, Nusar Hajarisman, Anneke Iswani Achmad

Abstract


In the social research, the research variable is usually cannot be measured directly (usually called as latent variable). Therefore, the variable needs an indicator as its measuring instrument. One of multivriat techniques is structural equation modeling (SEM) that is used in social researchs. Structural equation modeling (SEM) consists of 2 stages, the first approach is using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the second is by doing the structural equation modeling (SEM). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) approach is aimed to confirm that indicators used as the measuring instrument  are good enough to measure direct unmeasurable variables ( latent variable) seen from reliability score of those indicators. According to Hair, et al (1998) that reliability score is good when it has bigger score than 0,7. The results show that both composit and maximal reliablities have bigger scores than 0,7. It means that the scores of composit and maximal reliabilities can be accepted, it shows that all used indicators in this research is reliable.

Keywords


Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), compossit reliability, maximal reliability.

References


Bentler, P.M dan D.G. Bonnet (1980) Significant Test and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures, Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.

Browne M.W. dan R.Cudeck (1993) Alternative Way of Assessing Model Fit, di dalam K.A. Bollen dan J. Scott Long (editors) Testing Structural Equation Model, Sage Publication.

Hair, J.F., R.F. Anderson, R.L. Tatham dan W.C. Black (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th Edition, Prentice Hall.

Hajarisman, Nusar. (2008). Analisis Faktor dan Pemodelan Persamaan Terstruktur dengan Sistem SAS. Laboraturium Statistika Universitas Islam Bandung, Bandung.

Hajarisman, Nusar. (2014). Statistika Multivariat. Pusat Penerbitan Universitas Islam Bandung, Bandung.

Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future—A festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 195–216). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

Joreskog, Karl dan Dag Sobrorn (1989) Lisrel 7 User’s Reference Guide, Scientifit Software International.

McCallum, R.C., M.W. Browne dan H.W. Sugawara (1996) Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling, Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.

Michael, j.z., g. John geldhof, & kristopher j. Preacher. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confrimatory factor analysis framework. Psychological methods. 19(01), 72-91. doi: 10.1037/a0032138.

Steiger J.H. dan J.C. Lind (1980) Statistically based test for the number of common factor, Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.

Wijanto, Setyo Hari. (2008). Stuctural Equation Modelling dengan LISREL 8.8 Konsep dan Tutorial. Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/.v0i0.2618

Flag Counter     Â