Hubungan School Well Being dengan Student Engagement

Difa Hidayatishafia, Sita Rositawati

Abstract


Abstract. SMP Islam Terpadu Al-Ghifari is one of modern pesantren in Sukabumi. Santri spent all of their activities in pesantren, so that pesantren have to create conditions which can fulfill pupil’s basic needs as long as they lived in pesantren. School well being is a school conditions which is might be able to fulfill pupil’s basic needs that consists of having, loving, being and health. Pupil’s survey results indicated that while they lived in pesantren, they were well being. Pupils who well being was related to increase academic result, their attendance to school, prosocial behavior, school’s safety, and mental health (Noble etc, 2008). But, 100% of pupils have been broken minor infraction such as skip class, 43% of pupils have been broken serious offense such as escape, both their academic and non academic achievement are also in low level, they didn’t pay attention during class, and wasted their time to study. These indicated that they didn’t engage to their school, which is called as student engagement. Student engagement consists of 3 dimensions namely behavior engagement, emotional engagement and cognitive engagement. This study aim to know about the correlation between school well being and student engagement on santri in SMP IT Al-Ghifari, Sukabumi. The correlation result of this research is 0,550 which is indicated that there is strong and significant correlation between school well being and student engagement.

 

Abstrak. SMP Islam Terpadu Al-Ghifari adalah salah satu pesantren modern di Sukabumi. Santri menghabiskan seluruh kegiatannya di pesantren selama 24 jam, sehingga pesantren diharapkan mampu menciptakan kondisi yang dapat memuaskan kebutuhan dasarnya selama berada di pesantren. School well being adalah suatu keadaan sekolah yang memungkinkan individu memuaskan kebutuhan dasarnya, meliputi having, loving, being, dan health. Hasil survey menunjukan bahwa santri merasa sejahtera di sekolah. Siswa yang sejahtera akan berhubungan dengan peningkatan hasil akademik, kehadiran di sekolah, perilaku prososial, keamanan sekolah dan kesehatan mental (Noble, dkk, 2008). Tetapi kenyataannya, 100% santri pernah melakukan pelanggaran ringan, seperti bolos kelas, 43% santri pernah melakukan pelanggaran berat seperti kabur,mudah merasa bosan, prestasi akademik maupun non akademik juga rendah, santri lebih sering tidak memperhatikan ketika di kelas, dan menyianyiakan waktu belajar malam. Hal ini menunjukan bahwa santri tidak memiliki keterikatan dengan sekolah. Keterikatan kepada sekolah disebut sebagai student engagement, yang memiliki 3 dimensi, yakni keterikatan perilaku, keterikatan emosi, serta keterikatan kognitif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana hubungan school well being dengan student engagement pada santri di SMP IT Al-Ghifari, Sukabumi. Hasil korelasi dari penelitian ini adalah 0,550 yang menunjukan bahwa ada hubungan yang kuat dan signifikan antara school well being dengan student engagement.


Keywords


SMP Islam Terpadu Al-Ghifari, school well being, student engagement

References


Agustiani, Hendriati. (2009). Psikologi Perkembangan. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Azizah, Anistya., & Hidayati, Farida. (2015) Hubungan Antara Penyesuaian Sosial dengan School Well-Being (Studi Pada Siswa Pondok Pesantren Yang Bersekolah di MBI Amanatul Ummah Pacet Mojokerto). Seminar Nasional Educational Wellbeing

Cuyver, dkk (2011). Well being at school: does infrastructure matter?. Celeexchange. Institute for Educational and Information sciences, Instructional and Educational Science University of Antwerp. ISSN 2072-7925.

Fauzie, M Farah. (2012). Hubungan antara pemenuhan kebutuhan dasar psikologis dan keterlibatan siswa dalam belajar. Skripsi. Depok: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia.

Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the concept, state of evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74 (1), 59-109.

Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. (2005). School engagement. In K.A. Moore & L. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish?: Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development. New York, NY: Springer Science and Business Media.

Fredricks, J.A, & McColskey, Wedy. (2012). The Measurement of Student Engagement: A Comparative Analysis of Various Methods and Student Self Report Instruments. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, DOI 10.1007/978-1- 4614-2018-7_37.

Gilman, R., & Huebner, S. 2003 . A Review of Life Satisfaction research with Children and Adolescents. School Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 18 (2), 192- 205.

Hasbullah. (2012). Dasar-dasar Ilmu Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Hurlock, Elizabeth. (2002). Psikologi Perkembangan. Alih Bahasa: Tjandrasa. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Konu, A.I, & Lintonen, T.P. (2006). School Well-being Grades 4-12. Health Education Research, Vol 21, 633-642

Konu, A.I; Lintonen, T. P, & Rimpelä, M. K. (2002). Factors Associated with Childrens’ General School Well-being. Health Education Research, Vol 17 (2), 155- 165.

Konu, AI, & Rimpelä, T. P. (2002). Well-being in School: A Conceptual Model. Health Promotion International, Vol 17(1), 79-87.

Marks, H.M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Education Research Journal, 153-184

Masyhuri., & Zaenuddin. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Muliani, Annisa., Royanto, Lucia R. M., & Udaranti, Widayatri S. (2012). Hubungan Antara School Well-Being dan Keterlibatan dalam Kegiatan Belajar pada Siswa SMA Kelas 11. Skripsi. Jakarta: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Atmajaya

National Center for School Engagement. (2006). Quantifying School Engagement:Research report. Colorado.

Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11-39). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Noble, T., McGrath, H., Wyatt, T., Carbines, R., & Robb, L. (2008). Scoping study into approaches to student well-being. ACU National Australian Catholic University PRN 18219.

Noor, Hasanuddin. (2009). Psikometri. Bandung: Jauhar Mandiri.

Ormrod, J. E. (2006). Educational Psychology – Developing Learners (5th edition). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.

Page, R. M., & Tana, S. P. (2007). Promoting Health and Emotional Well-being in Your Clasroom (4th edition). New York: Jones & Barlett Publishers.

Papalia, Olds, dan Feldman. 2009. Human Development (11th edition). New York:McGraw-Hill.

Park, Sira., Holloway, D Susan., Arendtsz, Amanda., Bempechat, Janine., & Li, JIn. (2011). What Makes Students Engaged in Learning? A Time-Use Study of Within and Between-Individual Predictors of Emotional Engagement in Low- Performing High Schools. J Youth Adolescence 41:390–401 DOI 10.1007/s10964-011-9738-3

Santrock, J. W. (2008). Educational Psychology (3rd edition). New York: McGraw Hill,Inc.

Santrock, W John. (2009). Masa Perkembangan Anak. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode penelitian pendidikan (pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.

Towler, Vicky. (2010). Student engagement literature review. Department of Educational Research Lancester University.

Undang-Undang Negara Republik Indonesia No 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Yamin, Sofyan., & Kurniawan, Heri. (2014). SPSS Complete: Teknik Analisis Statistik Terlengkap SPSS (Edisi 2). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Yusuf, Muri. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Penelitian Gabungan. Jakarta: Penerbit Prenada

Zahra, H. A., & Udaranti, W. S. (2013). Hubungan school well-being dengan prestasi akademik pada siswa berbakat akademik kelas XI program akselerasi di Jakarta.Skripsi. Depok: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia.

Sumber Internet

https://belajar.kemdikbud.go.id/PetaBudaya/Repositorys/pesantren/, diakses pada 17 April 2016, pukul 20.38.

https://edutopia.org/blog/practices-for-increasing-student-engagement-nicholas- provenzano, diakses pada tanggal 1 Januari 2017, Pukul 11.00.

http://jabar.pojoksatu.id/sukabumi/2015/10/16/mui-dambakan-kota-mochi-jadi-kota-s antri/ diakses pada tanggal 23 Agustus 2016, pukul 21.51

https://lib.atmajaya.ac.id/default.aspx?tabID=61&src=a&id=257466, diakses pada

tanggal 29 Agustus 2016, pukul 22.21

http://pendis.kemenag.go.id/file/dokumen/pontrenanalisis.pdf, diakses pada 13 April 2016, pukul 13.10

http://radarsukabumi.com/2013/07/31/jauh-dari-ortu-terobati-telur-dadar/ di akses pada 20 Mei 2016, pukul 09.18

http://referensi.data.kemdikbud.go.id/tabs.php?npsn=20247075, diakses pada 20 Oktober 2016 pukul 01.37

http://www.republika.co.id/berita/dunia-islam/islam-nusantara/15/10/15/nw9fvm346- kota-sukabumi-digagas-menjadi-kota-santri-indonesia, diakses pada tanggal 23 Agustus 2016, pukul 21.51.

http://www.spssindonesia.com/2014/01/uji-validitas-product-momen-spss.html, diakses pada 27 Desember 2016, pukul 11.10.

http://www.spssindonesia.com/2014/01/uji-reliabilitas-alpha-spss.html, diakses pada 27 Desember 2016, pukul 11.10




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/.v0i0.5941

Flag Counter    Â