Hubungan Sense of Humor dengan Subjective Well-Being pada Comic Stand Up Indo di Kota Bandung

Gusty Riezkika Humaira, Siti Qodariah

Abstract


Abstract. Background of this research is Comics who has Sense of Humor and what they feel on their happiness and satisfaction experiences, which are different one to another. The research uses correlation method with 28 participants. Data collection method of this research based on Sense of Humor by Martin (2007) and Subjective Well Being by Diener (2009) theories under 0.734 reability and all data being analyzed by using Rank Spearman. It shows there are significant correlation for Sense of Humor and Subjective Well Being (rs=0.526). Cognitive components are the highest correlation (rs = 0.514) with Sense of Humor, where Specific Domain Satisfication take the highest part of this component (rs = 0.428).


Abstrak. Penelitian ini dilatar belakangi oleh Comic sebagai pelaku komedi dengan humor yang dimiliki dan kepuasan serta keadaan bahagia yang dialami Comic yang dipandang secara berbeda-beda tiap individunya. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah korelasi. Subjek penelitian sebanyak 28 orang yang merupakan populasi. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan alat ukur berupa skala yang diturunkan dari aspek-aspek Sense Of Humor dan Subjective Well-Being  dari Martin (2007) dan Diener (2009) dengan reabilitas 0,734. Berdasarkan pengolahan data menggunakan uji statistik rank spearman menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan yang cukup signifikan antara Sense Of Humor dengan Subjective Well-Being (rs = 0,526). Dari 28 Comic Stand Up Indo di Kota Bandung, Komponen Kognitif memiliki korelasi paling tinggi dengan Sense Of Humor (rs = 0,514) . Pada komponen-komponen Kognitif yang memiliki korelasi paling tinggi dengan Sense Of Humor pada Comic Stand Up Indo di Kota Bandung adalah Specifik Domain Satisfication( rs = 0,428). 


Keywords


Sense of Humor¸ Subjective well-Being, Comic

References


Apte, M. (2002). Humor and Laughter: An Anthropological Approach (4th edition). London : Cornell University Press

Arikuto, S. (2009). Manajemen Penelitian.Yogyakarta: Rineka Cipta

Azwar, Saifuddin. (2005). Sikap Manusia : Teori dan Pengukurannya. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Belajar

Bertens, K. (1999). Sejarah Filsafat Yunani. Yogyakarta : KANISIUS

Brown & Keegan. (1999) Stress Women in Workplace. Journal od Clinical Psychology, 49 (1), 13-23

Chapman, Anthony J. & Hugh C. Foot (1996). Human and Laughter : theory research, and application. New York : John Wiley & Sons

Diener, Ed. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin American Psychological Association, Inc., Vol. 95, No. 3, 542-575.

Diener, Ed, Eunkook M. Suh, Richard E. Lucas., & Heidi L. Smith. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 125, No. 2, 276-302.

Diener, Ed. (2000), Subjective Well-Being : The Science Of Happiness and a Proposal for a National Index. American Psychologist.

Diener, E., Oishi,S., & Lucas, R.E. (2003). Personality, Culture, and Subjective Well-Being : Emotional and Cognitive Evaluation Of Life.

Diener, Ed. (2009). Scale of Postive and Negative Experience. Diterima pada 16 Oktober 2016 dari http://www.positivepsychology.com

Diener, E. (2009). The Science Of Well-Being. Department Psychology. University Of Illinois-Champaign,Champaign, II, 61820. USA.

Diener, Pavot.., & Ed.(1993). The Review of Satisfication With Life Scale. Psychological Assesment.164-172

Edwards, K. R. & Martin, R. A. (2010). ‘Humor creation ability and mental health: Are funny people more psychologically healthy?’ Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 6, pp. 196–212. doi:10.5964/ejop.v6i3.213

Eid, M. & Larsen R.J. (2008). The science of subjective well-being. London: The Guilford Pers.

Hartanti. (2008). Anima, Indonesian Psychological Journal, Vol. 24, No. 1, 38-55. Surabaya : Universitas Surabaya

Hasanat, N.U., & Subandi. (1998). Pengembangan Alat Kepekaan Terhadap Humor. Psychological Journal, Vol 1:17-25. Yogyakarta : Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Kartini, K. (2005). Pemimpin dan Kepemimpinan. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers

Martin, R. A & H.M Lefcourt (1984). Sense of Humor as a Moderator of the Relastion between Stressos and Moods. Journal Of Personality and Social Psychology.

Martin, R.A., Puhlik-Dris, P.,Larsen, G., Gray,J. & Weir, k. (2003). Individual Difference in uses of Humor and their relation to Psychological Well-Being. Developnment of the humor Styles Questionare Journal Of Research in Personality.

Martin, R. A (2007). The Psychology of Humor : An Integrative Approach. San Diego, CA : Elsevier Academic Press.

Noor, Hasanuddin 2012. Psikometri Aplikasi Dalam Penyusunan Instrumen Pengukuran Perilaku. Cetakan kedua. Jauhar Mandiri.

Panji Nugroho. Potret Stand Up Comedy: Strategi Menjadi Comedian Handal. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.

Peterson, C & Seligman, M. (2004) Character Strengths and Virtues : a Handbook and Classification, New York : Oxford University Press.

Roeckelein, J.E. (2002). Psychology Of Humor : A Reference Guide amd Annotated Bibliography. Unite States : Greenwood Press.

Ruch, W. (2007). The sense of humor : Explanations of a Personality Characteristic. Berlin : Walter de Gruyter.

Saulo Sirigattia, etc, The Humor Styles Questionnaire in Italy: Psychometric Properties and Relationships With Psychological Well-Being Europe's Journal of Psychology, 2014, Vol. 10, 429–450

Siegel, S. (1997). Statistik Nonparametrik. Jakarta. Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Silalahi, U. (2009). Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung; PT Rafika Aditama

Sugiyono (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D Bandung

Alphabet

Sumber Internet

http://sidiqpriambodo.blogspot.co.id/2013/01/sejarah-awal-berdiri-stand-up-comedy-di.html (diakses pada hari sabtu 02 april 2016, jam 20.00)

https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand_Up_Indo#Sejarah (diakses pada minggu 03 april 2016, jam 13.09)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/.v0i0.5931

Flag Counter    Â