Studi Kontribusi Religiusitas Terhadap Work Engagement Pada Guru SD, SMP, dan SMA - Study Of The Contribution Of Religiosity To Work Engagement For Elementary, Middle, And High School Teachers

Sinthya Dewi Agustiany, Ali Mubarak

Abstract


Abstract. Religiosity is considered to be the main predictor of behavior, including at work. Work engagement is a positive work behavior that can provide many benefits for organizational results. Previous research found a positive influence of religiosity on work engagement. The purpose of this study was to examine how strong the contribution of religiosity to work engagement in teachers was. The research design used in this study is a contribution study, the population of this research is elementary, middle and high school teachers so that it uses a stratified random sampling method with a sample of 43 teachers. The analytical technique used in this study is a simple linear regression test. The measuring instrument used is The Centrality of Religious Interreligious Scale (CRSi) from Huber & Huber (2012) which has been adapted by researchers, and the Indonesian version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) from Schaufeli and Bakker (2003). The results showed that there was a positive and significant influence on work engagement with a contribution of 44.5% to teachers.

Keyword: Religiosity, Work Engagement, Elementary, Middle, and High School Teacher

Abstrak. Religiusitas dianggap dapat menjadi prediktor utama dalam bertingkah laku, termasuk dalam bekerja. Work engagementmerupakan suatu perilaku kerja positif yang dapat memberikan banyak manfaat bagi hasil organisasi. Penelitian terdahulu mendapati adanya pengaruh positif dari religiusitas terhadap work engagement. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menguji seberapa kuat kontribusi religiusitas terhadap work engagement pada Guru. Desain penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah studi kontribusi, populasi penelitian ini adalah guru SD, SMP dan SMA sehingga menggunakan metode sampling stratified random sampling dengan jumlah sampel 43 Guru. Teknik analisis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah uji regresi linear sederhana. Alat ukur yang digunakan adalah The Centrality of Religiosity Scale Interreligious (CRSi) dari Huber & Huber (2012) yang telah diadaptasi oleh peneliti, dan alat ukur Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) versi Indonesia dari Schaufeli dan Bakker (2003). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa adanya pengaruh positif dan signifikan religiusitas terhadap work engagement dengan kontribusi sekuat 44,5% pada Guru. 

Kata Kunci: Religiusitas, Work Engagement, Guru SD, SMP, dan SMA


Keywords


Religiusitas, Work Engagement, Guru SD, SMP, dan SMA

Full Text:

PDF

References


Achour, M., Mohd Nor, M. R., & MohdYusoff, M. Y. Z. (2015). Work-family demand and subjective well-being among female academicians: the role of muslim religiosity. The Role of Muslim Religiosity. Rev Relig Res 57, 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-015-0221- 6

Bakar, R. A., Cooke, F. L., & Muenjohn, N. (2016). Religiosity as a source of influence on work engagement: a study of the Malaysian finance industry. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016. 1254103

Bakker, A. B., (2011). An evidence-based model of work engagement. Association for Psychology Science, 20(4), 265-269. https://doi:10.1177/0963721411414534

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Journal of Career Development International, 13(3), 209-223. https://doi:10.1108/13620430810870476

Choi, Y. (2010). Religion, religiosity, and south Korean consumer switching behaviors. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9, 157 171. https://doi:10.1002/cb.292

Fauzan., Tyasari, I. (2012). Pengaruh religiusitas dan etika kerja islami terhadap motivasi kerja. Modernisasi, 8(3), 206-232. https://www.researchgate.net/publication 307667808_PENGARUH_RELI GIUSITAS_DAN_ETIKA_KERJA_IS MI_TERHADAP_MOTIVASIKERJA

Glock, C. Y. (2006). On the study of religious commitment. Religious Education: The Official Journal of The Religious Education Association, 57(S4), 98-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/003440862057S 407

Hadjam, M. N. R., & Nasiruddin, A. (2003). Peranan kualitas ekonomi, kepuasan kerja dan religiusitas terhadap kesejahteraan psikologis. Jurnal Psikologi, (2), 72-80. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jpsi/article/view/7 026

Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W.B. (2005). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(2006) 495-513. https://doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001

Holdcroft, B. (2006). What is religiosity?. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 10(1),89-103. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 313617744_What_Is_Religiosity

Huber, S., & Huber, W. O. (2012). The centrality of religiosity scale (CRS). Journal of Religions, 3, 710-724. https://doi:10.3390/rel3030710

Hutagalung, D., Asbari, M., Fayzhall, M., Ariyanto, E., Agistiawati, E., Sudiyono, R. N.,Waruwu, H., Goestjahjanti, F. S., Winanti., & Yuwono, T. (2020). Peran religiusitas, kepemimpinan transformasional, kepuasan kerja dan mediasi organizational citizenship behavior terhadap kinerja guru. Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 2(1), 311-326. https://ummaspul.e- journal.id/Edupsycouns/article/view/483

Ikwan, M. (2019). Penerapan nilai-nilai religiusitas individu dalam mencapai kepuasan kerja dosen. Tabyin: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 58 74.http://repository.unusa.ac.id/5968/1/Pe nerapan%20Nilai-Nilai%20 Religiusitas%20Individu%20Dalam%20 Mencapai%20Kepuasan%20Kerja%20Do sen.pdf

Krauss, S. E., Hamzah, A. H., Suandi, T., Noah, S. M., Mastor, K. A., Juhari, R., Kassan, H., Mahmoud, A., Manap, J. (2005). The muslim religiosity personality measurement inventory (MRPI)’s religiosity measurement model: toward filling the gaps in religiosity research on muslims. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum, 13(2), 131-145. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/T e-Muslim ReligiosityPersonalityMeasurement-the KraussHamzah/ec2b9fe53da44cfb8d5eb 09268d13669a60e1df

Kuntari, C. M. I. S. R. (2015). Hubungan work- family enrichment dengan work engagement pada perawat wanita. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat, 2(1), 407-417. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 317260429_HUBUNGAN_WORK FAMILY_ENRICHMENT_DENGAN_W ORK_ENGAGEMENT_PADAPERAWA T_WANITA

Maura, A. (2018, Juni 22). Fakta kualitas guru di Indonesia yang perlu anda ketahui. Ruang guru. https://www.ruangguru.com/blog/fakta kualitas-guru-di-indonesia-yang-perlu anda ketahui

Nugroho, A. S., & Savira, S. I. (2019). Hubungan antara efikasi diri dengan work engagement pada guru yang memiliki sertifikasi di SMPN Kecamatan Nganjuk. Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 6(2), 1-4. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index php/character/article/view/2790

Rahmawati, H. K. (2016). Kegiatan religiusitas masyarakat marginal di Argopuro. Jurnal Community Development, 1(2), 35-52. https://journal.iainkudus.ac.id/index.php/ omdev/article/view/2584

Revina, S. (2020, Oktober 13). Mengapa kualitas guru di Indonesia masih rendah?. Magdalene. https://magdalene.co/story/mengapa kualitas-guru-di-indonesia-masih-rendah

Rozikan. Zakiy, M. (2019). Pengaruh religiusitas dan tanggung jawab sosial terhadap etos kerja islami pada karyawan lembaga filantropi. Islamadina: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 20(2), 191 209. http://jurnalnasional.ump.ac.id/index.php SLAMADINA/article/view/4968

Roznowski, B., & Zarzycka, B. (2020). Centrality of religiosity as a predictor of work orientation styles and work engagement: a moderating role of gender. Journal of Religions, 11(387), 1-12. https://doi:10.3390/rel11080387

Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a across-national study. Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716. https://www.wilmarschaufeli.nl/publicati ns/Schaufeli/251.pdf

Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). Work engagement. What do we know and where do we go. Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology, 14(1), 3-10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication 230580677WorkEngagementWhatDOW KnowandWhereDoWeGoWorkEngagem ntineverydayLifeBusinessandAcademia

Silalahi, U. (2017). Metode penelitian sosial kuantitatif. Bandung: Refika Aditama Simmons, E. Sikorska. (2008). Religiosity and work-related attitudes among paraprofessional and professional staff in assisted living. Journal of Religion, Spirituality and Aging, 18(1), 65-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J496v18n01_05

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Susanti, R. (2015). Hubungan religiusitas dan kualitas kehidupan kerja dengan organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) pada karyawan. Jurnal Psikologi, 11(2), 94-102. http://ejournal.uinsuska.ac.id/index.php/p ikologi/article/view/1400

Topchyan, R., & Woehler, C. (2020). Do teacher status, gender, and year of teaching experience impact job satisfaction and work engagement?. Journal of Education and Urban Society, 00(0), 1-27. https://doi:10.177/001324520926161

Wahyuni, M. (2017). Pengaruh makna kerja dan occupational self-efficacy terhadap work engagement pada dosen tetap. Jurnal Psikologi, 10(1), 39-47. https://ejournal.gunadarma.ac.id/index.ph p/psiko/article/view/1632

Yudiani, E. (2016). Etos kerja islami dosen fakultas ushuluddin dan pemikiran islam UIN Raden Fatah Palembang ditinjau dari religiusitas. Jurnal Psikologi Islami, 2(1), 1-15. http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/psi kis/article/view/105

Yudiani, E. (2017). Work engagement karyawan PT. Bukit Asam Persero ditinjau dari spiritualitas. Jurnal Psikologi Islami, 3(1), 21-32. http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/psi kis/article/view/1390

Zamralita. (2017). Gambaran keterikatan kerja pada dosen-tetap ditinjau dari karakteristik personal. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni, 1(1), 338-345. DOI:10.24912/jmishumsen.v1i1.374




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/.v0i0.28417

Flag Counter    Â