Pengaruh Kepuasan Pertemanan terhadap Subjective Well-Being Remaja Panti Asuhan
Abstract
Abstract. The youth have a desire to forge more intimate friendships with their peers and friends exerted a greater influence in place of the influence that parents give. The role of friends in adolescent orphanages is becoming more important because the number of caregivers who act as parents ' surrogates is not comparable to the number of foster children so that most teenagers have not received enough attention from caregivers. One of the factors related to SWB is social relationships. Teenagers living in institutions are less satisfied with their lives and psychological welfare is lower than their peers who do not live in institutions. Teenagers living in orphanages are less able to get a warm and harmonious friend. The purpose of this research is to know how much friendship is influenced by the young SWB orphanage in the city of Bandung. The method of study used is quantitative non-experimental causality with a sample number of 333 subjects from 26 orphanages chosen in random systematic sampling. The collection of data using the measuring instruments of children's World is the satisfaction of friendship, CW-SWBS, and OLS. The results showed that friend satisfaction had an effect on SWB (CW-SWBS = 23.3%, and OLS = 14.2%) Youth Orphanage in the city of Bandung. The factors that influence friendship satisfaction in the orphanage youth in the city of Bandung is whether the treatment of friends to them.
Keywords: Adolescent, Orphanage, Friendship Satisfaction, Subjective-Well Being
Abstrak. Remaja memiliki keinginan untuk menjalin hubungan pertemanan yang lebih akrab dengan teman sebayanya dan teman memberikan pengaruh yang lebih besar menggantikan pengaruh yang diberikan oleh orang tua. Peran teman pada remaja panti asuhan menjadi lebih penting karena jumlah pengasuh yang berperan sebagai pengganti orang tua tidak sebanding dengan jumlah anak asuh sehingga sebagian besar remaja belum cukup memperoleh perhatian dari pengasuh. Salah satu faktor terkait SWB adalah relasi sosial. Remaja yang tinggal di institusi kurang puas dengan kehidupannya dan kesejahteraan psikologis lebih rendah dari pada teman sebaya seusianya yang tidak tinggal di institusi. Remaja yang tinggal di panti asuhan kurang mampu mendapatkan teman hangat dan harmonis. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui seberapa besar pengaruh kepuasan pertemanan terhadap SWB remaja panti asuhan di kota Bandung. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif kausalitas non-eksperimental dengan jumlah sampel 333 subyek dari 26 panti asuhan yang dipilih secara random systematic sampling. Pengumpulan data menggunakan alat ukur dari Children’s World yakni kepuasan pertemanan, CW-SWBS, dan OLS. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepuasan pertemanan berpengaruh terhadap SWB (CW-SWBS = 23.3%, dan OLS = 14.2%) remaja panti asuhan di kota Bandung. Adapun faktor yang mempengaruhi kepuasan pertemanan pada remaja panti asuhan di kota Bandung adalah baik tidaknya perlakuan teman terhadap mereka.
Kata Kunci: Remaja, Panti Asuhan, Kepuasan Pertemanan, Subjective-Well Being
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Astuti, N. P. (2014). Pengalaman psikososial anak remaja putri di panti sosial asuhan anak putra utama 3 tebet. (Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, 2014). https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/
Borualogo, I. S., & Casas, F. (2019). Adaptation and validation of the Children’s Worlds Subjective Well-Being Scale (CW-SWBS) in Indonesia. Jurnal Psikologi. 46(2). 102-116. https://doi.org/102.22146/jpsi.38995
Bradshaw, J., Keung, A., Rees, G., & Goswami, H. (2011). Children’s subjective well-being: International comparative perspectives. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(4), 548–556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.05.010
Burns, R. B. (1993). Konsep diri: Teori, pengukuran, perkembangan, dan perilaku. Jakarta: Arcan.
Casas, F. (2016). Children, adolescents and quality of life: The social sciences perspective over two decades. In F. Maggino (Ed.). A life devoted to quality of life. Festschrift in honor of alex c. Michalos. (pp. 3–21). Springer Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20568-7_1
Casas, F., & González-Carrasco, M. (2018). Subjective well-being decreasing with age: new research on children over 8. Child Development, 00(0), 1 – 20. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13133
Cheung, S. K., &. McBride-Chang, C. (2014). Friendship satisfaction. A. C. Micholas (ed), encyclopedia of quality of life and well being research. (pp. 2364 – 2366). Springer Science+Bussiness Media Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5
Cummins, R. A. (2010). Subjective wellbeing, homeostatically protected mood and depression: A synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9167-0
Cummins, R. A. (2014). Understanding the well-being of children and adolescents through homeostatic theory. Handbook of Child Well-Being, 635–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_152
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34
Dumas, T. M., Ellis, W. E., & Wolfe, D. A. (2012). Identity development as a buffer of adolescent risk behaviors in the context of peer group pressure and control. Journal of Adolescence, 35(4), 917–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.12.012
Eddington, N., & Shuman, R. (2005). Subjective well-being (happiness). Continuing Psychology Education: 6 Continuing Education Hours. 1-3. https://www.texcpe.com/html/pdf/ny/ONYSWB.pdf
Finch, J. F., Okun, M. A., Pool, G. J., & Ruehlman, L. S. (1999). A Comparison of the Influence of Conflictual and Supportive Social Interactions on Psychological Distress. Journal of Personality, 67(4), 581–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00066
Goswami, H. (2011). Social relationships and children’s subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 107(3), 575–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9864-z
Gunarsa, S., & Gunarsa, Y. (2008). Psikologi Perkembangan Anak dan Remaja. Jakarta: Gunung Mulia.
Hailegiorgis, M. T., Berheto, T. M., Sibamo, E. L., Asseffa, N. A., Tesfa, G., & Birhanu, F. (2018). Psychological wellbeing of children at public primary schools in jimma town: an orphan an non-orphan comparative study. Plos One, 13(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195377
Hartini, N. 2001. Deskripsi kebutuhan psikologi pada anak panti asuhan. Insan Media Psikologi. 3(2), 109 – 118. http://repository.unair.ac.id/id/eprint/28825
Hartup, W. W., & Stevens, N. (1999). Friendships and adaptation across the life span. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(3), 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00018
Herawati, Elly. (2018, April 7). Haru, Beginilah Kehidupan Anak-Anak di Panti Asuhan. Viva.co.id. https://www.viva.co.id/trending/1023879-haru-beginilah-kehidupan-anak-anak-di-panti-asuhan
Huebner, E. S. (1991). Initial development of the student’s life satisfaction scale. School Psychology International, 12(3), 231–240.https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034391123010
Hurlock, E. B. (2011). Psikologi perkembangan: suatu pendekatan sepanjang kehidupan edisi kelima. Erlangga.
Kapikiran, S. (2013). Loneliness and life satisfaction in turkish early adolescents: the mediating role of self-esteem and social support. Soc Indic Res, 111, 617-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0024-x
Kaye-Tzadok, A., Kim, S. S., & Main, G. (2017). Children’s subjective well-being in relation to gender — What can we learn from dissatisfied children?. Children and Youth Services Review, 80, 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.058
Koran Jakarta. (2018, Juli 18). Ratusan ribu anak tinggal di panti asuhan. Koran Jakarta Kebenaran itu Tidak Pernah Memihak. https://www.koran-jakarta.com/ratusan-ribu-anak-tinggal-di-panti-asuhan/
Lawler, M. J., Newland, L. A., Giger, J. T., Roh, S., & Brockevelt, B. L. (2016). Ecological, relationship-based model of children’s subjective well-being: perspectives of 10-year-old children in the united states and 10 other countries. Child Indicators Research, 10(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-016-9376-0
Llosada-Gistau, J., Casas, F., & Montserrat, C. (2016). What matters in for the subjective well-being of children in care?. Child Indicators Research, 10(3), 735–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-016-9405-z
Llosada-Gistau, J., Montserrat, C., & Casas, F. (2015). The subjective well-being of adolescents in residential care compared to that of the general population. Children and Youth Services Review, 52,150–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.11.007
Lubis, I., & Agustini, L. (2018). Efektivitas gratitude training untuk meningkatkan subjective well-being pada remaja di panti asuhan. Journal Psikogenesis, 6(2), 205-213. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335177139_Efektivitas_Gratitude_Training_Untuk_Meningkatkan_Subjective_Well-Being_Pada_Remaja_di_Panti_Asuhan/citation/download
Lyubomirsky, S., & Dickerhoof, R., (2005). Subjective well-being. In J. Worell & C. D Goodheart (eds.), Handbook of Girls’ and Women’s Psychological Health. Gender and Well-Being Across the Life-Span. (pp. 166 – 174). Oxford University Press.
Montserrat, C., Dinisman, T., Bălţătescu, S., Grigoraş, B. A., & Casas, F. (2014). The effect of critical changes and gender on adolescents’ subjective well-being: comparisons across 8 countries. Child Indicators Research, 8(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-014-9288-9
Navarro, D., Montserrat, C., Malo, S., González, M., Casas, F., & Crous, G. (2015). Subjective well-being: what do adolescents say?. Child & Family Social Work, 22(1), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12215
Newland, L., Giger, J., Lawler, M., Roh, S., Brockevelt., B & Schweinle, A. (2018). Multilevel analysis of child and adolescent subjective well-being across 14 countries: Child-and country-level predictors. Child Development. https://doi.org/90.10.1111/cdev.13134.
Oriol, X., Torres, J., Miranda, R., Bilbao, M., & Ortúzar, H. (2017). Comparing family, friends and satisfaction with school experience as predictors of SWB in children who have and have not made the transition to middle school in different countries. Children and Youth Services Review, 80, 149–156. https://doi.org/:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.053
Pemerintah Kota Bandung. (2018, Mei 25). Tahun 2017 daftar panti asuhan di kota Bandung. Open Data Kota Bandung. http://data.bandung.go.id/dataset/daftar-panti-asuhan-di-kota-bandung/resource/de7378e4-ac27-4832-aca5-d98659098041
Sahuleka, J. M. (2003). Panti Asuhan sebagai Suatu Lingkungan bagi Perkembangan Anak. (Skripsi, Universitas Indonesia). http://eprints.ums.ac.id/37823/1/02.%20NASKAH%20PUBLIKASI.pdf
Santiarsa, C.D., & Noor, H. (2018). Hubungan loneliness dengan life satisfaction pada remaja panti asuhan Al-Ikhlas Bandung. Prosiding Psikologi Unisba. 4(2),592 – 598. http://karyailmiah.unisba.ac.id/index.php/psikologi/article/view/11365
Santrock, J.W. (2002). Adolescence perkembangan remaja. Erlangga.
Savahl, S., Montserrat, C., Casas, F., Adams, S., Tiliouine, H., Benninger, E., & Jackson, K. (2018). Children’s Experiences of Bullying Victimization and the Influence on Their Subjective Well-Being: A Multinational Comparison. Child Development. 1-18 https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13135
Schutz, F., Sarriera, J., Bedin, L., & Montserrat, C. (2014). Subjective well-being of children in residential care centers: Comparison between children in institutional care and children living with their families. Psicoperspectivas. Individuo y Sociedad, 14(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-vol14-issue1-fulltext-517.
Wilson, R. E., Harris, K., & Vazire, S. (2015). Personality and friendship satisfaction in daily life: do everyday social interactions account for individual differences in friendship satisfaction?. European Journal of Personality, 29(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1996
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/.v6i2.22387
