The Juridical Analysis of Judge Decision Regarding the Suspect Status Determination According to Article 77 of the Criminal Procedure Code in Conjunction with the Constitutional Court Decision Number 21/PUU-VIII/2014 on Pretrial Extension Objects

Auliandi Nursetia Perdana, Dini Dewi

Abstract


One of the institutions created new laws in the Criminal Code is the pretrial institution. The powers and functions of pretrial District Court is an additional task to examine and decide: the validity of the arrest or detention; the validity of termination of the investigation or the discontinuation of the prosecution and demand compensation or rehabilitation for a criminal case was stopped at the level of investigation or prosecution. Pretrial Judge Sarpin Rizaldi in Decision No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel set the determination of the suspect Komjen (Pol) Budi Gunawan invalid. It can be concluded that the pretrial judge's decision Budi Gunawan is precisely because, although not listed in accordance with Article 77 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The constitutional court issued a decision No.21/PUU-VIII/2014 which contains an extension of the pretrial objects that enter into the determination of the status of suspects pretrial authority. Issues to be discussed in this thesis are: Pretrial Justice Decision Regarding the Determination of Status Suspect According to Article 77 of the Criminal Procedure Code JO Constitutional Court Decision No. 21/PUU-VIII/2014 About Pretrial Extension Objects. This type of research is normative for reviewing the decision of the pretrial Budi Gunawan with case number 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel that include case approach, legislation and conceptual. Procedures collection and processing legal materials in this thesis is to collect primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, which are then analyzed and an inventory of both the primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The judges' verdict in the pretrial setting Sarpin cancellation Budi Gunawan suspects in case number 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel. is appropriate, given the setting process Budi Gunawan suspects are in accordance with the Constitutional Court's decision on the expansion of pretrial object.

Keywords


Yuridis, Status Tersangka, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Objek Praperadilan

References


Buku

M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Penyidikan dan Penuntutan, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2003

Undang-Undang

Departemen Kehakiman, Keputusan Menteri Kehakiman tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Kepmen Kehakiman No. M.01.07.03 TH. 1982

Undang-undang Tentang Kekuasaan kehakiman, UU No. 4 Tahun 2004, LN. No. 8 Tahun 2004, TLN. No. 4358.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/.v0i0.2855

Flag Counter