Police Discretion Action in Investigation Based on Law Number 2 of 2002 on the Indonesian National Police (a Case Study of Police in Cibeunying Kaler)

Rendi Winarta, Sholahuddin Harahap

Abstract


discretion of police is an authority to act on its own authority that is based on common interests. Police discretion under Article 18 Paragraph 1 of Law No. 8 of 2002 on the Indonesian National Police. discretion conducted by police investigators basically accomplish the goal target more priority than the legality of the law. problems will arise when law enforcement in this case the police with the authority to enforce its discretion it actually is not, but forgive, waive, or take actions outside the specified process. Issues raised by the author are: 1) How does the application discretion by the police in the jurisdiction of Cibeunying Kaler? 2) What are the factors that drive and impede the implementation of the investigator's discretion as law enforcement jurisdiction of the Police of Cibeunying Kaler? The method used in this study is juridical sociological. Sociological juridical approach is a study that focuses on the behavior of individuals or society in relation to the law. In this case done by assessing and logically examine legal aspects of the issue of enforcing the law, they are "in abstracto" as well as "In concerto", which is an actual problem that lately under the spotlight of the public (in concerto). Based on the results of research and discussion can be concluded, the patterns wisdom of discretion is applied in practice the police in the jurisdiction police of Cibeunying Kaler depending on local circumstances such as by way of peace between the offenders with the victim, then made his case, and so on. In addition, in the act of discretion by investigators are factors that influence it. Internal driving factors consist of the substance of legislation, instructions from the leadership, law enforcement investigators, the situation in the investigation, an external factor in discretion by investigators is the support of the community. Besides, there are inhibiting factors in discretion, which are still weak law enforcement in Indonesia, financial constraints, local police officers, investigators knowledge, as well as participation of the parties.

Keywords


Police, Investigation, Discretion

References


A. Buku-buku

A Djazuli, Fiqih Jinayah, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2009

Barda Nawawi Arif, Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana, Citra Aditya Bhakti, Bandung, 1998

Barda Nawawi Arif, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1996

CST Simorangkir dkk, Kamus Hukum Indonesia, Alenia Baru, Jakarta, 1980

DjokoPrakoso, Polri Sebagai Penyidik Dalam Penegak Hukum Pidana, Jakarta, PT. Bina Akasara, 1987

Dudu Duswara Machumudin, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Sebuah Sketsa), PT. Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2003

Hardjon, Philipus M, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta, 1997

J.C.T Simorangkir,Kamus Hukum, Aksara Baru, Jakarta, 1980

John M. Echols dan Hasan Shadily, Kamus Inggris-Indonesia, Gramedia, Jakarta, 1988

Kospramono Irsan, Polisi dan Tantangan Masa Depan, Lokakarya Profesialisme dan kemandirian Polri, Bandung 3-4 Agustus, 1998

Koesparmono Irsan, Polri Mandiri dan Kebudayaan, Jurnal Polri, Jakarta, Edisi 2, 2000

Lawrence M Friedman, law and Behavioral Sciences, The Bobbs Herin, Indianapolis, 1996

Marlina, Pengantar Konsep Diversi dan Restorative Justice Dalam Hukum Pidana, USU Press, Medan, 2010

M. Fall, Penyaringan Perkara Pidana Oleh Polisi (Diskresi Kepolisian), Pradnya Pramita, Jakarta, 1991

Muladi, Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Badan Penerbit UNDIP, Semarang, 1995

Roeslan Saleh, Pikiran-pikiran tentang Pertanggunjawaban Pidana, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1984

Romli Atmasasmita, Sistem Peradilan Pidana,Bina Cipta, Bandung, 1996

Roni Hanitijo Soemitro, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Yurimetri, Galia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1994

Satjipto Rahardjo, Masalah Penegakan Hukum, Sinar Baru, Bandung, 1983

Soerjono Soekanto, Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Rajawali, Jakarta, 1983

Soerjono Soekanto, Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2002

Sunaryati Hartono, Politik Hukum Menuju Satu Sistem Hukum Nasional, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1991,

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Bab-Bab Tentang Penemnuan Hukum, Citra Adiya Bakti, Bandung,1993

Yesmil Anwar dan Adang, Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Widya Padjadjaran,Bandung, 2009

B. Undang-undang

Pasal 2a ayat (1), Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 58 Tahun 2010 tentang pelaksanaan KUHAP.

Hukum Acara Pidana, Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun1981.

Undang-undang Dasar 1945.

Undang-undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.

C. Sumber Lain

Kode Etik Profesi Kepolisian, http://www.metro.polri.go.id/kode-etik-kepol, (diakses 2 Desember 2015, 12.20 WIB).

Diskresi Kepolisian, http://krisnaptik.com/tag/polisi/, (diakses 2 Desember 2015, 12.45 WIB)

Diskresi Kepolisian, http://krisnaptik.com/polri-4/hukum-kepolisian/diskresi-kepolisian-ii/, (diakses 6 Januari 9.25 WIB).

Penerapan Asas Diskresi Dalam Pembuatan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara, http://studihukum.blogspot.co.id/2010/10/penerapan-asas-diskresi-dalam-pembuatan.html, (diakses 5 januari 2016, 19.21 WIB).

Fungsi dan peran Polisi, https://pospolisi.wordpress.com/2012/11/03/tugas-dan-wewenang-polri/, (diakses 5 Januari 2016, 18.10 WIB).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/.v0i0.2650

Flag Counter     Â